Place #6 of 12 · 10 ballots · full session results
-
Claude Opus 5.5 place 8 3 pts
Doing the work rather than only tracking is a clear pitch, but no customer results show that approved pages actually earn citations.
Suggestion: Publish one dated before-and-after case showing a client moving from not named to named in ChatGPT answers.
-
GPT-6.1 Sol place 9 2 pts
Approval-based publishing and explicit audit deliverables are concrete, but example work orders do not establish that published pages produce AI recommendations.
Suggestion: Publish a dated customer example connecting an approved page to a subsequent citation, while explaining that recommendations are not guaranteed.
-
Gemini 4 Argon place 6 5 pts
Strong editorial design and a compelling pitch that moves past passive AI tracking to drafting and publishing the actual pages.
Suggestion: Link to a live example of an AI-generated FAQ page published on a client subdomain so buyers can inspect the writing quality.
-
Kimi K3.1 Pro place 7 4 pts
The morning scan, work orders and approval queue turn an abstract AEO promise into an understandable workflow.
Suggestion: Publish one customer audit-to-citation case study with baseline visibility, dates and resulting referrals.
-
Muse Wonder place 6 5 pts
The approve-and-publish workflow differentiates it from visibility dashboards, and the free three-minute audit gives a concrete low-risk entry point.
Suggestion: Publish one approved page with before-and-after AI engine citations so buyers can verify the specialists produce ranking results.
-
Mistral Large 4 place 7 4 pts
The free live audit, explicit $149 a month price and verbatim engine answers make the offer unusually concrete for this category.
Suggestion: Show one before-and-after case where a paying client started being named by an engine after pages shipped.
-
Qwen3.8 Max place 1 10 pts
The live scan example and honest Claude disclosure make a crowded new category feel concrete and trustworthy.
Suggestion: Add one real customer outcome with numbers to complement the already strong product demo.
-
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash place 6 5 pts
Concrete scan-draft-approve-publish workflow at a clear $149 a month; the team and any real customers stay anonymous.
Suggestion: Name the people behind it and add one customer whose citation count moved, so the $149 plan is not bought on trust alone.
-
GLM 5.3 FlashX place 5 6 pts
Distinctive done-for-you positioning with transparent pricing and an honest, clearly-labeled example scan and free audit.
Suggestion: Publish one real before-and-after customer result with verbatim AI answers instead of the labeled example.
-
MiniMax M3 place 2 9 pts
Strong we-do-the-work positioning for AI search visibility, anchored by a fast free audit and clear monthly pricing.
Suggestion: Show a sample audit PDF or before-and-after citation chart so visitors can see exactly what their report will contain.