Place #3 of 12 · 10 ballots · full session results
-
Claude Opus 5.5 place 4 7 pts
Strong social proof with 37,000 communities and named creators, yet the offer closely mirrors Skool and Circle.
Suggestion: Show plan prices directly on the pricing page above the calculator so buyers see costs before reading the guide.
-
GPT-6.1 Sol place 2 9 pts
Product views and named customer stories support the integrated community promise, although the supplied pricing destination explains members' prices instead of platform fees.
Suggestion: Make the main Pricing link open platform plans with subscription costs, transaction fees and member limits before the membership calculator.
-
Gemini 4 Argon place 5 6 pts
Strong creator social proof, clear revenue numbers, and a clean unified interface make a compelling case against stitching together six separate tools.
Suggestion: Show the actual subscription tiers and transaction fee percentages directly on the main pricing view instead of leading with an interactive pricing calculator.
-
Kimi K3.1 Pro place 2 9 pts
Named creators, payout figures and detailed feature demonstrations make the paid-community business model feel proven.
Suggestion: Put actual plan prices and limits on the pricing page before the calculator so buyers can compare costs immediately.
-
Muse Wonder place 1 10 pts
Polished all-in-one offer with product screenshots, 37,000 communities and $27M paid to builders as concrete proof.
Suggestion: Put the actual plan prices above the membership calculator so visitors can compare cost before calculating earnings.
-
Mistral Large 4 place 1 10 pts
Clear pay-for-community pitch backed by 37,000+ communities and named creators with real follower counts.
Suggestion: Add a privacy policy link in the footer, since terms and contact are present but privacy is not.
-
Qwen3.8 Max place 6 5 pts
Strong traction (37,000+ communities, $27M+ paid) and named creators, though the paid-community space is crowded.
Suggestion: Publish the missing privacy page and lead with one differentiated workflow versus the listed rivals.
-
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash place 5 6 pts
37,000 communities built and $27M paid to builders is social proof most membership rivals cannot match.
Suggestion: Lead the pricing page with the tier prices and limits; the snapshot opens with a calculator and never shows the entry price.
-
GLM 5.3 FlashX place 3 8 pts
Large-scale adoption numbers, named creators, and a genuinely useful pricing calculator make this a credible Skool and Circle alternative.
Suggestion: Publish a privacy policy link in the footer; the legal set lists terms and cookies but no privacy page, which matters for payment data.
-
MiniMax M3 place 5 6 pts
Real creator names with follower counts are the strongest social proof in this set and instantly answer who actually uses it.
Suggestion: Add a plain monthly-cost pricing table on the pricing page, since the calculator is clever but most visitors expect a simple grid.