Best Website Monitoring Products in 2026 as suggested by SaaSHub Experts

Fifty free monitors, clear tiered pricing and named case studies make a strong, low-risk default.

Suggestion: Show the multi-location check feature with a regional result screenshot, since it currently sits as a small card.

The 50-monitor free tier, named customer case studies, and explicit paid limits create a convincing adoption and upgrade path.

Suggestion: State the free plan's five-minute interval beside 'real-time alerts' in the hero to set accurate detection expectations.

Polished, high-trust category staple with 50 free monitors and strong social proof, though its core feature set is now widely replicated.

Suggestion: Add an interactive live demo link in the hero section so visitors can explore the dashboard interface before registering.

Fifty free monitors, concrete case studies and enterprise controls make the product easy to adopt and difficult to outgrow.

Suggestion: Put the Free plan beside paid tiers at the top of pricing so its 50-monitor allowance is easier to compare.

Clear hero, real dashboard screenshot, 50 free monitors and named customer cases make the offer immediately credible.

Suggestion: Replace the number one claim in the hero with a specific proof point, such as check interval or monitored sites, beside the signup button.

3.5M users, a 4.7-star rating and a 50-monitor free tier make its scale impossible to ignore.

Suggestion: Move or tone down the on-page ads so the free-plan pitch stays the first thing visitors read.

The category leader with 3.5M users, real case studies and a generous free tier, but offers nothing a newer rival does not.

Suggestion: Differentiate the homepage by leading with the mobile app or multi-location checks rather than repeating the same uptime pitch as everyone else.

Free 50 monitors, 20 plus integrations, named customers and transparent pricing make this the safest default in the category.

Suggestion: Trim the long feature grid so the free-50-monitors offer and the 30-second setup appear before the first scroll.

The most polished page here: clear promise, real case studies, named customers and a genuinely useful free tier with transparent paid steps.

Suggestion: The category is crowded with cheaper and deeper rivals; give one concrete reason to pick it over them above the fold beyond '#1'.

Industry leader with massive social proof, generous free tier, and integrations that cover most workflows.

Suggestion: Trim the trust-stacking hero so product screenshots appear above the brand-name logos for new visitors.

Quorum-based alerting with a detailed probe infrastructure table is a distinctive, well-evidenced answer to false-positive pages.

Suggestion: Add a short credit-to-euro example near the hero so prepaid pricing is understandable without visiting the pricing page.

The quorum workflow gives a concrete reason to switch, although fleet counts differ between the dashboard example and surrounding copy.

Suggestion: Update the dashboard example and confirmation thresholds to match the current 20-probe fleet throughout the homepage.

Exceptional technical clarity and craft; the multi-continent, multi-network quorum architecture directly solves the false-positive paging problem that plagues standard monitors.

Suggestion: Surface the EUR 5 prepaid credit pricing numbers directly on the homepage alongside the free check allowance so buyers immediately see upgrade costs.

The quorum workflow, per-probe incident evidence and self-monitoring infrastructure directly address false alarms with unusual technical rigor.

Suggestion: Reconcile the 15-probe and 20-probe descriptions across the homepage and catalogue copy to keep the infrastructure story precise.

Down means down quorum from three continents is a memorable, specific answer to false-alert fatigue, backed by detailed probe evidence.

Suggestion: Publish the prepaid credit pricing table prominently, since the homepage explains credits but pricing text is not visible in the snapshot.

Quorum-based alerting across continents is a genuinely fresh take on a crowded uptime category.

Suggestion: Add a named company or team behind PingWise in the footer so visitors know who stands behind the alerts.

The quorum-based down detection is the most original idea in this set, explained with a live dashboard and infrastructure table that proves it works.

Suggestion: Add a short animated sequence showing the confirmation rounds in action so the quorum concept lands visually within five seconds.

Quorum checking across 20 probes is a real answer to false positives, and the typography and probe tables are excellent.

Suggestion: State the credit price and the typical monthly cost of one 30-second monitor on the homepage.

Quorum-based confirmation across continents is a sharp, well-evidenced answer to false alarms, with transparent infrastructure detail and generous free checks.

Suggestion: Add two or three more named customer quotes like Paul Kelsall's to reduce reliance on a single testimonial.

Genuinely differentiated quorum-based approach with a clear infrastructure story and honest free tier.

Suggestion: Show a screenshot or short demo of the live probe view so the unique quorum concept is easier to evaluate at a glance.

Per-region readings on status pages is a sharp angle, but 'Trusted by 32 teams' signals a very young customer base.

Suggestion: Replace the 32 teams line with a link to one real customer status page using regional readings.

Clearly labeled examples explain regional degradation honestly, and the client-account model gives agencies a specific reason to adopt.

Suggestion: Place a compact product-by-product pricing comparison beside the four-product overview so buyers can estimate their combined bill.

Sharp positioning around per-region visibility rather than misleading global green dots, supported by clean editorial design and honest early-stage traction metrics.

Suggestion: Display the exact dollar prices for the paid tiers of Status, Monitor, and Errors directly on the main pricing overview page.

Persistent regional readings and clearly labeled examples turn partial-outage visibility into a convincing, well-demonstrated advantage.

Suggestion: Add one compact comparison table for all four products so buyers can estimate their total cost without opening each plan.

Per-region readings shown by default is a clear, honest differentiator, with demo, docs and transparent example-data labelling.

Suggestion: Add one named customer quote with results beside the trusted by 32 teams line to strengthen early social proof.

Showing every region's reading instead of one green dot is a sharp, honest answer to partial outages.

Suggestion: Grow beyond 32 named teams by adding case studies or testimonials to the homepage proof strip.

The per-region reading concept is genuinely differentiated and the page executes it clearly with four coherent products under one account.

Suggestion: Grow the trust section beyond 32 teams by adding one or two named customer quotes with company names to counter the small-number impression.

Per-region readings that refuse to hide a partial outage are the sharpest idea here, and example data is labelled honestly.

Suggestion: Replace the trusted by 32 teams line with a link to a real public status page or a named customer.

The per-region honesty angle is distinctive and beautifully presented, with a demo, trust centre and a refreshingly modest '32 teams' claim.

Suggestion: Grow visible proof beyond 32 teams; even two short named customer stories would materially strengthen the trust story.

Strong regional-readings angle with a multi-product bundle that addresses real status-page pain points.

Suggestion: Surface a concrete price on the homepage and replace the vague '32 teams' claim with named customer logos.

Transaction and real user monitoring backed by SolarWinds add depth, but screenshots look dated and there is no free tier.

Suggestion: Replace the 2021-dated dashboard screenshots and 2022 badge with current product views.

Synthetic transactions and real user monitoring provide convincing depth, supported by screenshots and a concrete subscription calculator.

Suggestion: Replace the dense homepage audience paragraphs with concise diagnostic examples linking synthetic failures to real user performance data.

Combines 100+ location synthetic checks, transaction testing, and real user monitoring in one mature platform, though the interface screenshots look dated.

Suggestion: Update the low-resolution hero screenshot from 2021 with a sharp, current view of the synthetic and RUM dashboards.

Combined synthetic and real-user monitoring remains useful, but dated screenshots and a 2022 badge weaken the presentation.

Suggestion: Replace the dated dashboard imagery and 2022 award badge with current product views and recent customer evidence.

Broad synthetic and real user monitoring with clear trial and calculator pricing, though design and proof feel dated.

Suggestion: Modernize the hero screenshot and remove the 2022 award badge so the product does not look dated beside the trial offer.

SolarWinds backing and a 30-day fully functional trial make the paid entry feel low-risk.

Suggestion: Lead with the concrete price per month on the homepage instead of only a yearly calculator.

SolarWinds backing ensures longevity, but the homepage looks unchanged for years and the pricing calculator buries the actual cost.

Suggestion: Redesign the hero with a current product screenshot and show the starting price directly instead of requiring visitors to use the calculator.

SolarWinds backing, synthetic plus real user monitoring and credible customer quotes, but the entry price and page feel dated.

Suggestion: Replace the faded hero dashboard screenshot with a current one and show check limits beside the $16.5 starting price.

Clear, credible SolarWinds product, but the build-your-own subscription calculator makes real cost hard to pin down at a glance.

Suggestion: Replace the subscription calculator on the pricing page with three or four prebuilt example plans showing typical monthly totals.

Recognisable brand with strong real-user monitoring, but the visual design feels dated for a 2026 leader.

Suggestion: Refresh the homepage hero and add an entry tier beyond the 30-day trial to lower the barrier for new customers.

The cost comparison against a stitched tool stack is persuasive, though region counts conflict between 4, 10 and 15.

Suggestion: Use a single, consistent monitoring region count across the hero cards, workflow steps and pricing table.

The connected incident workflow and live example support the proposition, but inconsistent region counts weaken an otherwise specific offer.

Suggestion: Reconcile the 10-region and 15-region homepage claims with plan-specific region limits in one consistent comparison table.

Strong cost-consolidation pitch and EU privacy focus, though check regions vary inconsistently across the copy between 4, 10, and 15.

Suggestion: Reconcile the conflicting region counts across the homepage and pricing table, and add the missing unit to the 'every 120' check interval.

The connected detection-to-postmortem workflow and tracker-free infrastructure make consolidation practical rather than merely a pricing promise.

Suggestion: Reconcile the 10-region and 15-region claims and label pricing check intervals with units.

Strong all-in-one positioning with live example, concrete check counts and privacy-first EU infrastructure as a clear differentiator.

Suggestion: Reconcile the 10-region and 15-region claims on the homepage so the monitoring coverage reads consistently.

Privacy-first positioning with no trackers, EU hosting and a genuinely free forever plan stands out clearly.

Suggestion: Reactivate or replace the inactive source repository link so the privacy-first claim is backed by public code.

The privacy-first angle and all-in-one workflow are well presented with real usage numbers and a polished gradient design.

Suggestion: Lead with the live example status page link more prominently since the product screenshot in the hero is small and hard to read.

Privacy-first all-in-one monitoring, incidents and status pages with visible usage stats, real logos and a genuine free plan.

Suggestion: Rename the navbar brand from Hosted Status Page to StatusPage.me, so visitors do not confuse the free tier with StatusPage.io.

A convincing consolidation pitch with a strong free plan and cost comparison, though the maker behind it stays oddly anonymous.

Suggestion: Name the team or company behind StatusPage.me on the site to back the production-scale claims.

Clear positioning as a privacy-first, EU-hosted all-in-one alternative to stitching multiple tools together.

Suggestion: Surface the free plan more prominently on the homepage so first-time visitors can try without hunting through pricing.

Broad, well-presented feature grid covering domain, DNS, SSL and link crawling, though the homepage says paid plans start at $12 while pricing shows $10.

Suggestion: Align the homepage price claim with the $10 Starter plan on the pricing page so the two figures match.

Domain, link, and indexability checks make the combined dashboard useful beyond uptime, while AI claims remain less concrete.

Suggestion: Add an expandable Site Score breakdown showing which failed checks reduce the score and their recommended remedies.

Broad all-in-one site health coverage with an immediate interactive URL prompt, though the cookie banner obscures the main dashboard graphic.

Suggestion: Fix the pricing mismatch between the homepage ($12/mo) and pricing page ($10/mo), and move the cookie banner off the hero preview.

The polished health dashboard makes broad monitoring tangible, but the homepage and pricing page quote different entry prices.

Suggestion: Align the $12 homepage claim with the $10 Starter plan and explain any billing condition behind the difference.

Polished all-in-one dashboard showing score, SSL, DNS and links makes breadth tangible, despite vague AI-supported claims.

Suggestion: Move the cookie banner below the hero dashboard on desktop so it does not obscure the site score proof visitors came to see.

The 87/100 site score and global probe map make its all-in-one dashboard feel tangible within seconds.

Suggestion: Fix the pricing mismatch between the tagline and the $10 starter plan so costs are unambiguous.

The site score concept and breadth of checks are appealing, but the cookie consent banner overlapping the hero on load hurts first impression.

Suggestion: Move the cookie consent to a non-intrusive bottom bar so it does not cover the site score card that is the page's strongest visual.

Wider than plain uptime monitoring, covering DNS, SSL, link crawls and sitemap checks, with an honest free tier and plan table.

Suggestion: Move the cookie banner off the hero, since it currently covers the site score demo that proves what the product does.

Clean, well-organised all-in-one site monitoring with a live-score hero and an honest free plan, but no visible customers or track record yet.

Suggestion: Add real customer examples or a public live status page of WebPixie itself to replace the anonymous sample dashboard.

Polished all-in-one monitoring with strong free tier and clear audience targeting across personas.

Suggestion: Add real customer logos or named case studies to back up the marketing claims about who uses WebPixie.

Real product screenshots, demo, GitHub and customer logos show a mature tool, though it is infrastructure monitoring more than website monitoring.

Suggestion: Add a short hero line naming who it replaces, such as Nagios web UI users, to sharpen the ten-second message.

Screenshots, an active repository, and detailed edition boundaries support a credible open-source platform, though website monitoring is not its clearest entry point.

Suggestion: Add a website-monitoring quick-start beside the hero with an HTTP check, certificate alert, and installation requirements.

Deep infrastructure and server monitoring framework backed by an active repository and clear enterprise upgrade path, though broader than simple website monitoring.

Suggestion: Publish public subscription pricing tiers for the Enterprise Edition and fix the 'Mange exporters' typo in the Prometheus section.

An active open-source foundation, detailed edition comparison and unusually broad integrations support serious infrastructure monitoring deployments.

Suggestion: Add a short setup path for Nagios and Prometheus teams linking system requirements, the demo and the correct download.

Deep open source platform with demo, GitHub, agents and many integrations, but breadth targets infrastructure admins more than website monitoring buyers.

Suggestion: Add a website-monitoring starter path showing a URL check setup in minutes, separate from the full infrastructure platform story.

Active GitHub repo, a German company behind it and a free community edition make the open-source model credible.

Suggestion: Add a terms of service link and publish the enterprise subscription prices to close trust gaps.

A genuinely capable open source monitoring framework with active development, real screenshots and a named German company behind it.

Suggestion: Modernize the hero section - the blue gradient background and dated screenshot styling make it look older than the product actually is.

Mature open source monitoring with Prometheus and Checkmk integrations, a real company behind it and 27 listed integrations.

Suggestion: Put the Community versus Enterprise differences and what a subscription costs directly on the pricing page beside the feature table.

A mature open-source monitoring platform with a live demo, GitHub repo, detailed edition comparison and a named German maker behind it.

Suggestion: Lead with one concrete customer outcome above the fold instead of the feature carousel; the 'Trusted by' logos deserve prominence earlier.

Sustainable open-source model with active development, clear company behind it and a paid upgrade path.

Suggestion: Simplify the homepage so the core offer lands in under ten seconds before the long feature carousel begins.

A decade-old, clearly priced status page service with big-name logos, but the $79 entry price faces cheaper bundled rivals.

Suggestion: Add a short section near pricing explaining what justifies $79 versus free status page tiers, such as infrastructure redundancy.

Detailed notification, access-control, and infrastructure options support serious incident communication, but monitoring mainly appears through external integrations.

Suggestion: Add a prominent workflow showing exactly how an external monitor triggers component changes and subscriber notifications.

Battle-tested status page platform with strong enterprise customers and compliance controls, though focused on incident communication rather than built-in website probing.

Suggestion: State clearly on the homepage whether trials are free without a credit card, and modernize the dated laptop frame in the hero.

Redundant hosting, detailed plan limits and recognizable customers support a credible enterprise incident communication offer.

Suggestion: Add a guided incident-to-notification demo so buyers can examine the complete workflow before starting a subscription.

Clear status page screenshot and strong logos, but 79 dollars monthly for communication alone narrows value versus monitoring bundles.

Suggestion: Add a lower entry option or trial framing on the homepage to soften the 79 dollar starting price against all-in-one rivals.

A decade of operation and logos from IBM, Samsung and Airbus give real enterprise credibility.

Suggestion: Surface uptime-monitoring features, not just status pages, since the entry plan starts at $79 per month.

Decade-old platform with Docker, IBM and GitLab as customers, but the homepage design has not kept pace with newer rivals.

Suggestion: Refresh the hero section with a modern product screenshot and remove the dated laptop mockup frame that wastes vertical space.

A decade-old, deeply featured status page platform with strong logos, but everything starts at $79 per month.

Suggestion: Show the starting price and subscriber limits on the homepage rather than only behind the pricing link.

A decade-old status page platform with strong enterprise features and recognisable customers, though the dated design undersells it.

Suggestion: Modernise the homepage visuals and add a product screenshot of the incident workflow, not just the public status view.

Established player with impressive enterprise logos but no free tier and a high entry price for small teams.

Suggestion: Add a starter tier below $79/mo so smaller teams can trial the product without committing to enterprise pricing.

Live directory stats and signed attestations make a niche product unusually verifiable, though the audience of MCP maintainers is still small.

Suggestion: Show one example signed report page directly on the homepage so maintainers see exactly what their claimed listing looks like.

Signed attestations and explicit unchecked states provide unusually concrete evidence, but the scope is MCP endpoints rather than general websites.

Suggestion: Show a sample protocol failure and tool-schema diff immediately below the URL input to demonstrate the practical monitoring outcome.

Highly credible, verifiable protocol and schema drift monitor built specifically for MCP servers, with live directory telemetry and cryptographic attestations.

Suggestion: Add a one-sentence plain-English definition of Model Context Protocol in the hero for general developers landing on the page.

Signed attestations, public result histories and precisely explained observation counts provide exceptional evidence for a sharply defined niche.

Suggestion: Link one complete signed report beside Run check so maintainers can inspect the evidence before submitting a server.

Highly differentiated signed evidence, live directory counts and real result pages give unusual verifiable proof for a narrow audience.

Suggestion: Add a short plain-language explainer for non-MCP visitors linking this to website monitoring, or focus the hero entirely on maintainers.

Signed Ed25519 attestations and a four-state model make its evidence verifiable in a way most monitors cannot match.

Suggestion: Add a docs link and name the team or company behind the signing keys on the homepage.

Uniquely serves MCP server monitoring with signed attestations and live directory data that proves real usage at scale.

Suggestion: Add a visual product screenshot or animated demo of a signed report page so visitors see the output before reading about it.

Signed four-state evidence for MCP servers is genuinely new, backed by real directory counts, but the audience is narrow.

Suggestion: Open with a two-sentence summary of what a maintainer receives in the first eight hours of claimed monitoring.

A genuinely novel idea - signed, verifiable MCP server monitoring - presented with unusually honest, specific numbers and methodology notes.

Suggestion: The dense text-first page buries the product; add one visual example of a signed report page near the top.

Highly specialised niche with a credible signed-attestation model but a tiny natural audience.

Suggestion: Add a screenshot of a real check result near the top so visitors unfamiliar with MCP can grasp the value quickly.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring is a real niche, but the hero buries it behind a generic pipe-separated subtitle.

Suggestion: Rewrite the hero headline around Minecraft server status pages and show a TPS chart screenshot there.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring creates a credible niche, with clear paid limits and an identifiable support contact.

Suggestion: Replace the Minecraft section's illustration with an actual TPS/MSPT history chart showing a slowdown and its associated alert.

Clever niche specialization combining website monitoring with Minecraft server TPS and MSPT metrics, let down by generic stock illustrations and typos.

Suggestion: Replace the generic vector clip art with actual screenshots of the Minecraft TPS/MSPT historical charts and fix typos like 'Managemement'.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT history give this otherwise conventional status platform a genuinely useful niche.

Suggestion: Replace the generic feature illustrations with captioned TPS, MSPT and incident dashboard screenshots to demonstrate the workflow.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring is genuinely niche-specific, but the generic hero buries that strength below a broad status page claim.

Suggestion: Show a real Minecraft TPS chart screenshot in the hero instead of only a generic status page image.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring with a month of history is a real niche few status page tools cover.

Suggestion: Link the Support Center and Knowledgebase from the homepage so new users can find setup docs.

Fills a real niche for Minecraft server operators with TPS monitoring and status pages, but the design and evidence feel early-stage.

Suggestion: Show a real Minecraft server monitoring chart with TPS data on the homepage instead of only describing the feature in text.

Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring plus status pages are explained clearly, but the operation looks like one person with no docs yet.

Suggestion: Publish the plugin setup walkthrough with screenshots and a worked example status page, since the homepage only describes the flow in prose.

The only option here monitoring Minecraft TPS and MSPT directly, with a clear free tier, though evidence is mostly illustrations rather than real screenshots.

Suggestion: Replace the stock illustrations with real screenshots of the TPS/MSPT charts and incident dashboard.

The Minecraft TPS and MSPT monitoring is genuinely unique, but the audience is narrow and the design feels dated.

Suggestion: Add a screenshot of the Minecraft performance chart at the top so the unique value is visible in under ten seconds.

Clear headline and concrete feature list, but no visible company name, privacy or terms links lowers confidence for a paid monitor.

Suggestion: Add a footer with the legal entity name, privacy policy and terms links next to the launch special banner.

Specific monitoring options and sample alerts explain the offering well, but the page provides limited evidence beyond illustrative components.

Suggestion: Add a public dashboard demo showing check history, incident details, and regional results for a real monitored endpoint.

Clear explanation of standard uptime checks, but relies on text mockups rather than real UI screenshots and lacks company transparency.

Suggestion: Replace the coded text blocks with actual product dashboard screenshots and add company ownership details to the footer.

Sample alerts and specific check settings explain the service well, though its capabilities closely follow established monitoring products.

Suggestion: Publish privacy and terms pages naming the operator and explaining endpoint, alert and subscriber data handling.

Clear three-step setup and concrete alert example, but generic feature list and unsupported SLA claim give little differentiation.

Suggestion: Add linked privacy and terms pages and a named company footer to match the trust implied by the 99.9 percent SLA claim.

Feature list is standard, but the homepage has no privacy policy, terms or docs links visible.

Suggestion: Publish privacy, terms and docs pages and link them in the footer before asking for account data.

Competent uptime monitor with a polished dark theme, but missing privacy and terms pages undermines trust for a monitoring tool.

Suggestion: Publish privacy policy and terms of service pages, then link them in the footer where visitors expect to find them.

Clear feature list, sample alert email and a status page mock, but the page says little about who runs or funds the service.

Suggestion: Show the plan table with monitor limits and the SMS, multi-region and status page differences directly on the homepage.

A competently built but undifferentiated uptime monitor, weakened by no visible privacy or terms pages and a confusing free-trial-versus-free message.

Suggestion: Publish clear privacy policy and terms pages and state plainly what is actually free versus the 14-day trial.

Clean and well-organized homepage but offers no distinct advantage over established alternatives like UptimeRobot.

Suggestion: Add customer logos or case studies from real paying teams to differentiate from better-known competitors with identical features.

The 'Trusted by' line has no logos beneath it and the page shows no sample scan result, making it feel thin.

Suggestion: Show a sample scan report screenshot under the hero and remove the empty 'Trusted by' heading.

The free scanner is an accessible entry point, but repeated compliance promises lack a visible sample report or demonstrated remediation.

Suggestion: Publish a sample scan separating technical observations from legal interpretations, with reproducible cookie findings and one concrete configuration fix.

Clear focus on automated GDPR and cookie compliance scanning, but the homepage shows zero visual evidence of the scanner reports or dashboard.

Suggestion: Add a sample compliance scan report screenshot below the hero URL input and list the actual logos under the 'Trusted by' heading.

The free scan is easy to understand, but repetitive compliance copy and no sample findings leave the audit quality unproven.

Suggestion: Publish an anonymized sample report showing detected cookies, failed checks, evidence and the exact remediation output.

Free URL scan is instantly clear, but for website monitoring the page offers compliance checks rather than uptime evidence or reports.

Suggestion: Show a sample scan report with scored findings and fixes above the fold instead of only listing compliance categories.

Automated GDPR scanning with a clear not-a-lawyer disclaimer keeps its compliance claims honest and specific.

Suggestion: Clarify on the pricing page how the free scan differs from the paid continuous monitoring.

The homepage is thin on product evidence - no screenshots, no customer logos, and the layout reads as SEO scaffolding rather than a product page.

Suggestion: Replace the text-only compliance solutions grid with an actual screenshot of a scan result showing specific findings a visitor would receive.

Clear GDPR scanning pitch and four visible tiers, but there is no product screenshot and the trust line names no customers.

Suggestion: Replace the empty trusted by developers, startups and agencies line with one real scan report screenshot.

The free scan hook is clear, but the page shows no product screenshots and the empty 'Trusted by' strip undermines its own claim.

Suggestion: Show a real scan result report - the actual output - where the empty trusted-by strip and plain text blocks now sit.

Solves compliance rather than uptime monitoring, so it sits awkwardly in a website-monitoring comparison.

Suggestion: Add a real product screenshot of the scan results so the value of running the compliance check is visible immediately.