Who AI Knows

Clear worked example shows all fifty answers and a fact-accuracy check, though there is no visible company or social proof.

Suggestion: Make the pricing link show plans publicly instead of an account signup form.

The fifty-answer walkthrough explains scoring unusually well, but the captured pricing destination asks for an account rather than showing plan details.

Suggestion: Make the pricing link open a public plan comparison with weekly allowances before asking visitors to create an account.

Exceptional clarity and step-by-step product walkthrough on the homepage, though clicking the pricing link redirects straight to an account signup wall.

Suggestion: Make the Pricing navigation link display actual plan tiers and features instead of forcing visitors onto the account creation screen.

The worked fifty-answer example explains exactly how the score is built, making an otherwise abstract AI visibility service unusually inspectable.

Suggestion: Show full plan limits and prices on the pricing view so visitors can compare weekly monitoring before creating an account.

Detailed example rating explains scoring across fifty answers, sources and factual accuracy in unusually transparent terms.

Suggestion: Restore a readable pricing table on the pricing page listing what each plan adds every Monday.

The free one-minute score with a fully worked example report explains the method better than most paid pages.

Suggestion: Add documentation explaining exactly how the 0-100 score is calculated, since docs are not linked.

The step by step walkthrough of exactly how the 51 of 100 score is computed is the most honest page in this set.

Suggestion: Add documentation and a short case study showing a real score improving after fixes were applied.

An unusually honest rating tool: it shows all fifty answers, cites its sources and explains exactly how the score is built.

Suggestion: Publish one complete sample report publicly so buyers can read the whole deliverable before signing up.

An exceptionally well-explained methodology: fifty real answers, a transparent scoring rubric and an honest example where the site contradicts Gemini.

Suggestion: Surface the paid plan details more prominently; a visitor must dig past the rating explainer to learn what Monday re-checks actually include.

The most thoughtful page of the twelve: the example report reads like a real audit, the scoring is transparent, and the privacy banner is upfront.

Suggestion: Trust would rise with a named company, address and at least one verifiable user or review; the footer only lists an email and a copyright.