Session #22

Strong GDPR positioning and clear tiers, though a German pricing heading appears on the English page.

Suggestion: Translate the Ein Preis pricing section on the English homepage.

German hosting and a modular booking-to-payment workflow give the scheduling offer a coherent business case with explicit upgrade paths.

Suggestion: Translate the German pricing introduction on the English homepage, including the first-year discount and renewal explanation.

A strong, GDPR-focused scheduling and business suite with clear positioning, solid social proof, and transparent modular pricing.

Suggestion: Translate the remaining German text in the English pricing section ('Ein Preis. Alle Apps. Keine Add-on-Falle') and shrink the oversized cookie banner.

German hosting, a free tier and modular scheduling-to-invoice tools make the expansion beyond bookings easy to understand.

Suggestion: Keep the English pricing section fully translated and reduce the cookie dialog so the workflow demonstration remains visible.

GDPR-compliant scheduling hosted in Germany, expanding into video, CRM and invoicing, is a sharp alternative to a US tool stack.

Suggestion: Move the 50,000 customer proof and named client logos above the modular app list so the scheduling benefit lands before the suite complexity.

An established, GDPR-focused scheduling suite with 50,000+ customers, clear pricing and strong trust signals.

Suggestion: Add a short product tour video on the homepage; the breadth of 17 apps is impressive but the core scheduling flow needs a visual walkthrough.

Modular GDPR suite with 50,000 customers and clear pricing; the 17-app grid reads ambitious but coherent.

Suggestion: Lead the hero with one concrete customer outcome instead of the cookie-consent card overlapping the first screen.

Clear GDPR-in-Germany positioning, transparent freemium pricing and a concrete booking-to-invoice flow; the cookie banner covers the product demo on first screen.

Suggestion: Cut the cookie wall so the booking demo is visible on first load, and put the free plan and its limits in the hero.

The GDPR-hosting wedge is clear and the modular pricing is concrete, but a cookie banner covers the hero and a German headline interrupts the English page.

Suggestion: Move the cookie dialog below the fold and translate the 'Ein Preis. Alle Apps.' section so the English page reads consistently.

Strong EU-hosted, GDPR-DPA positioning with named modules and a real price comparison to incumbents; very trustworthy.

Suggestion: Replace the German pricing block on the home page with the English version so visitors do not see mixed-language copy.

Exceptionally concrete: live prices, browser attestation check, named investors and memberships.

Suggestion: Add a short diagram or code snippet showing the attestation flow from client to TEE right under the intro paragraph.

Live cluster verification, explicit hardware support, and usage or licensing prices make a technically demanding privacy proposition concrete and commercially credible.

Suggestion: Add a copyable attestation-and-inference quickstart beside the live verification link to shorten the path from evaluation to integration.

No-nonsense, technical presentation of hardware-encrypted AI inference and GPU VMs, backed by live browser cluster attestation and transparent pricing.

Suggestion: Add a brief architecture diagram on the homepage showing how client-side attestation verification works before the first token is sent.

Browser-verifiable attestation, exact infrastructure prices and named backers provide exceptional substance for a technically demanding product.

Suggestion: Publish a short workload guide showing how a customer verifies attestation and sends its first confidential inference request.

Hardware-encrypted inference with client-side attestation, named GPU pricing and licensed deployment options serve a precise regulated and AI-lab audience.

Suggestion: Add a short attestation walkthrough showing exactly what a client verifies before sending its first prompt to the live DeepSeek endpoint.

A technically credible confidential computing provider with named VC backers and unusually transparent per-token pricing.

Suggestion: Add product screenshots or a short demo video; the text-only monospace design does not show the dashboard or verification flow.

VC-backed confidential inference with verifiable attestation and concrete per-token pricing is genuinely differentiated.

Suggestion: Add one architecture diagram or short demo so non-specialists grasp TEEs within ten seconds.

Precise token and GPU-hour pricing with named backers, but the sparse text-only page gives a buyer almost nothing to look at.

Suggestion: Show a screenshot of the attestation check and a sample inference response; the plain page hides a product that barely needs design.

Transparent per-token pricing, named backers and consortium memberships serve infra buyers well, though only one model is live on the endpoint.

Suggestion: Surface the browser attestation verification more prominently, since verifiability is the entire reason a buyer would choose you over Phala.

Narrow, real audience and verifiable pricing per token, but the page reads like a memo rather than a buyer-friendly overview.

Suggestion: Add a one-paragraph 'why now' framing and a customer logo to convert engineers into procurement-ready leads.

Clear ticket-to-PR pitch with credit pricing and refunds on failed missions, in a crowded agent market.

Suggestion: Show one real completed mission with its PR link, cost and proof video directly below the hero.

The four-agent workflow and mission pricing are specific, but a pull request alone is a weaker guarantee than the verified-outcome headline suggests.

Suggestion: Publish one complete sample mission with its original issue, pull request, test recording, consumed credits, and any remaining human corrections.

A well-designed autonomous coding agent platform that stands out by attaching test recordings as proof of work and refunding failed missions.

Suggestion: Embed a public sample pull request link on the homepage so developers can inspect the code quality and attached test proof directly.

The four-agent workflow, visual proof of work and mission-based pricing make autonomous development unusually concrete.

Suggestion: Add a complete public mission example linking a real issue to its plan, tests, costs and final pull request.

Four specialist agents delivering a reviewed, tested pull request with screenshots and cost tracking go beyond single-agent code generation.

Suggestion: Show one complete real mission above the fold, from assigned issue to tested pull request, with its timeline, cost and proof screenshots.

Strong positioning for AI code quality control with a differentiated multi-agent approach and transparent per-mission pricing.

Suggestion: Publish the source repository or a public changelog; the inactive repo undermines trust for a developer-facing tool.

Mission-control framing with proof of work and cited benchmarks makes autonomous coding feel accountable.

Suggestion: Put a live or recorded end-to-end mission in the hero instead of only static screenshots.

Specific agent roles, a benchmark and per-mission pricing set it apart from single-agent tools; no named company or team behind it lowers trust.

Suggestion: Name the company and team behind SHIP and add a screenshot of the proof-of-work and refund policy in the pricing flow.

Excellent craft and a credible plan-build-review-test pipeline with benchmark research, though it enters a crowded field against Devin and Factory.

Suggestion: Publish one verifiable end-to-end mission recording on a public repo so sceptical engineers can see the proof-of-work claim in action.

Clear autonomous-team story with concrete per-mission pricing and a Mission Control screenshot that looks real.

Suggestion: Add two public PRs delivered through SHIP, with diff links, so visitors can judge output quality before buying credits.

Strong evidence with real product screenshots, clear $5 pricing and named company, though the board space is crowded.

Suggestion: Lead the hero with one concrete differentiator, such as cross-board dependency maps, instead of the generic boards headline.

Detailed interface screenshots, clear plan boundaries, and a named company make the broad board-management proposition unusually easy to evaluate.

Suggestion: Add a three-step cross-board dependency example near the hero to demonstrate why teams should move beyond familiar standalone boards.

An exceptionally well-crafted project management tool that stands out with cross-project focus queues, self-hosting options, and AI agent attribution.

Suggestion: Move the cookie consent banner to a bottom corner so it does not sit between the hero text and the main product screenshot.

Detailed product views, self-hosting and transparent limits give this cross-board workspace more credibility than its crowded category suggests.

Suggestion: Lead with one cross-project dependency example that shows exactly what Trello cannot do without extra tools.

Cross-project views, dependencies and self-hosting at five dollars per user give teams a credible reason to leave familiar board tools.

Suggestion: Lead the first product screenshot with the cross-board Up next queue enlarged, since that view best separates Kanera from ordinary Kanban boards.

A polished, open-source project tool with clear pricing, strong trust signals and active development.

Suggestion: Lead with one concrete differentiator on the homepage, such as cross-project dependency tracking, instead of listing every feature.

Self-hostable, source-available boards with AI-agent hooks and exhaustive comparison pages.

Suggestion: Lead with the cross-project Up-next queue, since the board view alone looks like Trello.

Polished dark landing page with real board screenshots and honest $5 pricing; the tiny in-page product shots are hard to read at full size.

Suggestion: Replace the near-black screenshot carousel with two or three legible board and Gantt screenshots a visitor can read without opening a modal.

Rich real screenshots, self-hosting option, active source repo and a named company make this unusually credible, but it fights Trello and Jira head-on.

Suggestion: Lead with the cross-board dependency and Up next views as the headline differentiator instead of generic board familiarity.

Polished project tool with clear AI-agent and cross-board angle, though the cookie banner pushes the hero screenshot out of first view.

Suggestion: Move the privacy banner lower or dismiss by default so the live product screenshot is the first thing visitors see.

Qualified eIDAS timestamping is a real differentiator, but three app mockups render as blank phones.

Suggestion: Fix the empty phone screenshots in the From capture to check section.

Qualified timestamps and account-free verification create a clear distinction, while the explicit limits on location claims build credibility.

Suggestion: Link a downloadable sealed sample beside the hero so visitors can try browser verification before installing the app.

Solves a very real dispute problem in rentals and handovers using legally grounded EU eIDAS timestamps and clear verification workflows.

Suggestion: Show a screenshot of the browser-based verification page on the homepage so buyers can see what their recipients actually experience.

Qualified timestamps, browser verification and concrete rental scenarios distinguish this from ordinary photo watermark apps.

Suggestion: Fill the three empty phone frames in the capture-to-check sequence with the checklist, seal and verification screens.

A qualified eIDAS timestamp on photos and every video frame, verifiable without an account, directly answers costly handover and damage disputes.

Suggestion: Fill the empty phone frames in the capture-to-check section with the sealed file and browser verification result recipients actually receive.

A well-explained timestamp camera with a genuinely unique eIDAS qualified trust service differentiator.

Suggestion: Add a short video showing the verify flow in action; the legal value of the timestamp is easier to grasp when seen.

Qualified eIDAS timestamp turns a camera app into legal evidence; the dispute stories are sharp.

Suggestion: Show a real verified report end-to-end on the homepage, not only phone mockups.

Sharp explanation of why a phone date proves little, with a qualified EU timestamp as the differentiator; the verify step is described but never shown.

Suggestion: Add one screenshot of the verify result page and one of a sealed file in the dashboard, so a buyer sees the check end to end.

The qualified eIDAS timestamp and browser verification are a real differentiator, explained with unusually honest copy like 'reported, not established'.

Suggestion: Add one named business customer or case study from the car-rental sector to move the pitch from plausible to proven.

Strong, narrowly useful product with a verifiable eIDAS angle and concrete car-rental handover example.

Suggestion: Add a short verified-time demo video at the top of the page so the 'since when' claim is shown, not just told.

Clear physician-built offer with per-clinician pricing, but stats like 94.5% uptime contradict the 99.9% claim.

Suggestion: Correct the stats bar so uptime and data storage figures match the hero claims.

Per-clinician pricing and physician-led positioning fit a costly operational problem, but stylized module graphics provide limited proof of the working interface.

Suggestion: Replace the hospital hero photo with an annotated scheduling screen demonstrating a credential conflict and the resulting warning.

Targets a high-value healthcare staffing problem with a unified clinician record and credible physician-founder domain expertise.

Suggestion: Replace the simplified illustrative UI cards with full-screen screenshots of the actual multi-hospital scheduling grid and credentialing pipeline.

Scheduling, credentials, onboarding and compensation share one clinician record, addressing a costly administrative workflow.

Suggestion: Replace the contradictory uptime and storage percentages with verified figures and a real multi-hospital scheduling screenshot.

One record linking scheduling, credentials, onboarding and compensation addresses a costly and clearly defined medical-group problem.

Suggestion: Replace the conflicting uptime figures on the homepage with one verified number and add a named customer story with measurable results.

A focused healthcare workforce platform with a credible physician-founder story and clear modular pricing.

Suggestion: Add customer logos or a short case study above the fold; healthcare buyers need social proof before a demo request.

Physician-built workforce platform with per-clinician pricing undercuts enterprise incumbents clearly.

Suggestion: Move the cookie banner off the hero and add one named customer logo as real proof.

One record for scheduling, credentials and pay is a real healthcare gap, but the hero claims 99.9 percent uptime while the body says 94.5 percent.

Suggestion: Let the CCTV of a captcha, the 94.5 percent uptime badge, and the 99.9 percent uptime claim agree; pick one number and correct it everywhere.

Clear per-clinician pricing, a named physician founder with a personal story, and credential-to-compensation integration answer QGenda with a plausible wedge.

Suggestion: Show a real product screenshot of the scheduling grid on the homepage instead of stock photos and static mock tiles.

Combines scheduling, credentials, onboarding and compensation with clear per-clinician pricing and a founder story that lands.

Suggestion: Add one named customer with measurable results, like hours saved per month, to back the strong claims.

The working wheel loads instantly as the homepage, but it competes with many identical wheel sites.

Suggestion: Add a visible terms page and contact link in the header or footer next to privacy.

The immediate wheel interface and detailed odds controls make the utility tangible, though its core proposition is widely served.

Suggestion: Make the Entries panel explicitly label the displayed yes-or-no wheel as a sample instead of saying there are no entries.

Drops the visitor straight into a fast, working random picker wheel with thorough documentation and sensible Pro upgrades for streamers and teachers.

Suggestion: Pre-populate the default wheel with a richer example than 'Yes or no' to immediately showcase custom weights and colors.

The wheel works immediately without signup, while unusually detailed controls and documentation support classrooms, streams and large giveaways.

Suggestion: Add a compact example beside the default wheel showing weighted entries and exact odds, then link its shareable result.

The working wheel is immediately usable without signup, with weighted entries, elimination mode and up to 10,000 entries.

Suggestion: Add a visible fairness explanation above the wheel linking the cryptographic randomness claim to the exact odds shown for weighted entries.

The wheel works instantly and the documentation is thorough, but ads and missing terms/contact weaken trust.

Suggestion: Add a terms page and a contact email; free tools that collect account data need a visible legal and support path.

Instant, well-documented wheel with crypto fairness and streamer pickers in a crowded space.

Suggestion: Add terms and a contact link, and show one real shared-wheel example above the long how-to.

The working wheel loads instantly and the fairness and weighting details are documented well; the category is crowded and no terms page is present.

Suggestion: Add a terms page and a single screenshot showing a wheel someone actually made and shared, not only the default yes or no wheel.

The working wheel on the homepage plus unusually thorough documentation and honest crypto-randomness claims build real trust in a saturated category.

Suggestion: Sharpen the pitch for one audience, like teachers or Twitch streamers, since Wheel of Names already owns generic 'free spinner' searches.

The wheel is the page, which is the clearest possible demo; detailed docs and Stripe-checkout Pro build real trust for a free tool.

Suggestion: Surface the funding model clearly on the home page so free users understand ads and Pro exist without hunting.

Honest, detailed offline export, though warranty reminders are admitted as not yet sent.

Suggestion: Ship email warranty reminders and say so in the hero, since deadlines are the core value.

Searchable offline exports offer meaningful ownership, and limitations are candid, but sample illustrations reveal little of everyday receipt management.

Suggestion: Add a short actual-interface walkthrough showing receipt upload, correction of an extracted field, search, and opening the exported copy.

A clean receipt organizer with a unique downloadable offline HTML archive, though the shared multi-app credit pricing feels convoluted.

Suggestion: Simplify the offline export copy by removing technical edge cases about multi-part ZIP folders from the main marketing flow.

The unusually precise offline export instructions and honest limitations make receipt portability feel real rather than decorative.

Suggestion: Move the simple three-step receipt workflow above the detailed export rules, and shorten the repeated offline explanations.

The searchable offline ZIP with photos, PDFs, JSON and CSV is a genuinely useful safeguard against losing purchase records.

Suggestion: Add working warranty reminders before promoting saved dates, because expiry alerts are the recurring reason to keep receipts in BuyKeep.

Clear niche tool with a distinctive offline export; the AI-credit model and PlenDesk ecosystem are thoughtfully explained.

Suggestion: Add a short demo video or interactive sample receipt on the homepage so visitors see the product working before signing up.

Offline searchable receipt copy is a clever, honest differentiator for a small PlenDesk app.

Suggestion: Show a real populated receipt collection, not fictional sample data, to prove everyday value.

The offline export of receipts with photos and PDFs is a genuine differentiator and the steps are explained honestly and precisely.

Suggestion: Show one real receipt scanned by the AI with the extracted fields beside it, rather than the fictional backpack example twice.

The offline-export angle is a genuinely distinct, honest feature, but the page leans on fictional sample data rather than showing real receipts in use.

Suggestion: Replace the fictional backpack example with a real anonymised collection screenshot to prove the offline HTML export works as described.

Distinct offline-export story and clear sample receipt, but the offline workflow description runs long and may scare first-time users.

Suggestion: Lead the home page with a 30-second animated demo of dropping a receipt and opening the offline copy.

Polished pitch, but income claims like $500-$5K per site and mismatched $19.99 versus $25 pricing weaken trust.

Suggestion: Make the pricing consistent everywhere and replace the earnings badges with real customer examples.

Combining lead discovery, website creation, and invoicing fits freelancers, but income claims outpace the visible evidence of delivered client sites.

Suggestion: Replace the hero earnings badge with a linked published client site and disclose the credits required to build and revise it.

Combines an AI website builder with local lead generation and invoicing for freelancers, though some UI text is cut off in the graphics.

Suggestion: Fix the truncated 'Customize An' graphic in step 02 and align the $19.99 tagline claim with the $25 Starter plan on the pricing page.

Combining site generation, local lead finding and invoicing gives freelancers a coherent path from prospect to payment.

Suggestion: Replace the illustrative earnings figures with a labeled customer case study showing the site built, outreach sent and payment received.

Combining AI site generation, a 200M-business lead finder and recurring client billing matches how freelancers actually find and sell website work.

Suggestion: Publish three live client sites with the freelancer name, build time and amount invoiced so the income claims can be checked.

A clean, well-designed AI website builder for freelancers with integrated lead finding and invoicing.

Suggestion: Add a contact page and more founder/company details; launched December 2025 with no visible team or support path.

Coherent build-leads-get-paid bundle for freelancers with strong product mockups.

Suggestion: Reconcile the $19.99 hero price with the $25 Starter plan and add a contact page.

Clear builder-plus-lead-finder-plus-invoicing pitch for freelancers, but no contact page and an unnamed operating company weaken trust.

Suggestion: Add a contact page and name the team behind ViralStudios LLC, and show one completed client site with a real domain and its invoice.

The lead-finder-plus-invoicing bundle fits freelancers, but get-rich framing, placeholder hero art, and a $19.99 tagline against $25 pricing erode trust.

Suggestion: Replace the gradient placeholder site mock with a real customer site and reconcile the homepage and pricing page prices.

Clear freelancer-pitch and good live preview, but the pricing page only shows credits and no published site from a real customer.

Suggestion: Add two named freelancers with a real published site, photo and revenue number, beside the testimonial quote.

The gallery shows output, but there is no headline explaining the product and many tiles load blank.

Suggestion: Add a one-line header above the gallery explaining copy-prompt-and-remix, plus visible privacy and terms links.

The polished visual gallery offers immediate inspiration, but the homepage does little to explain how prompts become editable creations.

Suggestion: Add a short gallery introduction and an expanded example showing its prompt, remix controls, and generation credit cost.

An immediate visual gallery of AI images and videos, but it lacks a value proposition headline, prompt remix previews, and basic company transparency.

Suggestion: Add a compact hero header above the gallery explaining that visitors can inspect prompts and remix creations directly.

The browsable model-filtered gallery demonstrates the core inspiration workflow immediately, but many blank tiles weaken the presentation.

Suggestion: Load or hide unfinished gallery tiles and add visible privacy, terms and contact links before requesting account creation.

The curated image and video gallery makes browsing by model and category immediate, but prompt remixing is not demonstrated on the homepage.

Suggestion: Show the prompt, model settings and remix panel on one gallery item without login so visitors can test the core workflow immediately.

A functional AI prompt gallery with clear credit-based pricing, but no visible privacy or terms pages.

Suggestion: Add privacy, terms and contact links in the footer; creators sharing work need to know how their data is handled.

Attractive prompt gallery with inline remix and generation across many models.

Suggestion: Add privacy, terms and contact pages; an anonymous maker collecting user creations erodes trust.

The gallery loads fast and the prompt-per-image idea is easy to grasp, but the site has no privacy, terms or contact pages at all.

Suggestion: Add privacy, terms and contact pages, and show one prompt copied into a finished generation to prove the remix workflow works.

A genuinely useful prompt-gallery with visible generation credits pricing, but the crowded prompt-tool space and missing privacy or terms links weaken confidence.

Suggestion: Add linked privacy and terms pages and a named team or contact so creators feel safe generating on paid credits.

Gallery is a good idea but the page shows many broken thumbnail placeholders and links to no privacy or terms page.

Suggestion: Hide empty model thumbnails until they have content and publish a privacy and terms page before driving paid signups.

Real screenshots and a phone number help, but the pricing page shows no actual prices.

Suggestion: Put the $19 per month tier and free plan limits visibly on the pricing page.

Real scheduling screenshots and material-shortage details support a substantial manufacturing workflow, though the large introductory banner delays the product.

Suggestion: Replace the stock-photo features banner with a readable schedule screenshot showing capacity, a late operation, and its downstream effects.

Addresses a real production scheduling pain point for small manufacturers, but the generic consulting template and tiny screenshots undersell the software.

Suggestion: Replace the dark stock photo header of people in suits with a large, readable screenshot of the drag-and-drop production schedule.

The capacity-aware scheduling details and real interface screenshots make a credible case for small manufacturers.

Suggestion: Put the actual free and paid tier limits beside the pricing promise, and add privacy and terms links to the footer.

Capacity-aware scheduling verified against real material dates targets a painful spreadsheet problem for small manufacturers, but the proof is hard to inspect.

Suggestion: Replace the tiny dark screenshots beside each feature with one large readable Gantt view showing a late order, capacity conflict and rescheduled downstream tasks.

A feature-rich scheduling tool for small manufacturers, but the dated design and missing privacy/terms pages hurt credibility.

Suggestion: Redesign the homepage with a modern layout and add privacy and terms pages; manufacturers handle sensitive production data.

Real small-manufacturer niche with capacity-aware scheduling and product screenshots.

Suggestion: Publish actual pricing numbers and add privacy and terms pages so it reads as a product, not a consultancy.

Capacity-aware production scheduling is a real gap for small shops, but the dated page shows tiny, unreadable table screenshots and no privacy or terms pages.

Suggestion: Put two readable screenshots of the scheduling grid and capacity heatmap above the fold and link privacy and terms pages from the footer.

Real shop-floor scheduling with a physical address and phone feels authentic, but the dated design and pricing page with no actual prices hurt conversion.

Suggestion: Publish the actual tier prices on the pricing page and add a short product demo video of the drag-and-drop rescheduling.

Solves a real shop-floor pain, but the site looks dated, hides the app behind a feature list, and links to no privacy or terms page.

Suggestion: Add a live, clickable screenshot of the schedule grid above the fold and publish a privacy and terms page.

A cashback modal blocks the entire homepage on arrival, hiding the marketplace and pricing tools.

Suggestion: Replace the blocking Squirtle day modal with the existing top banner so first-time visitors see the hero.

Collector analytics and subscription limits are concrete, but the first-visit cashback modal obscures the marketplace before visitors understand it.

Suggestion: Replace the first-visit cashback modal with a compact banner so visitors can inspect cards and market tools immediately.

A promising low-fee Pokemon card marketplace and analytics tool, but an intrusive promotional modal completely blocks the homepage.

Suggestion: Remove the full-screen 'Squirtle day' cashback modal for first-time visitors so they can actually read your value proposition and see the marketplace.

The subscription pricing is specific, but the fullscreen promotion hides nearly all evidence of the marketplace and analytics.

Suggestion: Replace the fullscreen cashback modal with a slim banner, then show live listings and a real price-history chart.

The 4.9 percent fee, Stripe KYC and live raw and graded prices give collectors a concrete reason to trade here.

Suggestion: Remove the full-screen Squirtle popup on first load so visitors see the marketplace headline, live listings and scanner before any promotion.

A large cashback popup blocks the homepage, hiding the actual marketplace from first-time visitors.

Suggestion: Move the Squirtle day promo behind a dismissible banner instead of a modal that covers the hero on load.

Marketplace-plus-analytics idea is sound but a promo modal hides the entire homepage on load.

Suggestion: Make the Squirtle-day modal dismissible by default or a thin banner so the marketplace is visible immediately.

Low 4.9 percent seller fee and live price charts are a real draw, but a full-screen cashback pop-up hides the marketplace from a first visitor.

Suggestion: Move the Squirtle cashback modal off the first screen or make it dismissible once, and show the marketplace and price charts underneath.

A full-screen Squirtle promo modal buries the actual marketplace on the very first screen, so a visitor cannot see what the product is or judge it.

Suggestion: Downgrade the cashback modal to a slim banner so first-time visitors see the buy, sell and pricing pitch immediately.

The homepage opens with a full-screen cashback modal that hides the actual marketplace, so first impressions fail.

Suggestion: Replace the modal with a dismissible top banner and let the marketplace and live prices load as the hero.