Session #28

Quorum-based alerting is a sharp, well-explained differentiator backed by detailed infrastructure specifics.

Suggestion: Add a short example showing how many credits a typical 20-monitor setup uses per month.

The incident timeline and explicit quorum rules explain the monitoring proposition far better than generic reliability claims.

Suggestion: Place a credit calculator beside the free allowance showing monthly costs for common monitor counts and intervals.

Brilliant positioning and technical transparency solve false-positive alert fatigue through a clear 15-probe quorum architecture and fair prepaid pricing.

Suggestion: Add company registration details and a physical address in the footer to match the high technical trust of the infrastructure section.

The quorum logic, per-probe incident evidence and generous free credits directly address false-page monitoring fatigue.

Suggestion: Show a prepaid credit cost estimator for common check intervals and monitor counts.

Quorum-confirmed downtime from 15 probes is a sharp, memorable differentiator, supported by a detailed dashboard, infrastructure explanation and generous free credits.

Suggestion: Publish a worked credit calculation for ten monitors at one-minute intervals so buyers can predict monthly prepaid costs instantly.

Quorum alerting across 15 probes on six continents is a genuinely differentiated answer to false-positive pages.

Suggestion: Show a real alert notification and a credit balance running down so the prepaid credit model feels concrete.

Quorum-based monitoring that pages only on cross-continent agreement, with generous free credits and rich docs.

Suggestion: Add a customer logo row or count of monitored hosts to convert the strong engineering into social proof.

Quorum across 15 probes on 6 continents is a genuinely different answer to alert fatigue, explained with exact rules and free tools.

Suggestion: Say what the paid credits cost and what the 650,000 monthly free credits cover above the fold, before signup.

The quorum model is genuinely differentiated versus UptimeRobot and Pingdom, demonstrated with a real incident timeline and 650,000 free monthly credits.

Suggestion: Surface a customer quote or two real monitoring examples to convert the strong technical story into social proof.

A genuinely differentiated monitoring model explained with real infrastructure detail, generous free credits, and free public tools that build trust.

Suggestion: Add a public status page showing PingWise monitoring itself so prospects can see the system working in the open.

Polished page with real product screenshots, a live demo and concrete specifics like Stripe, Plaid and ESIGN.

Suggestion: Show the Basic and Pro prices directly on the homepage next to the finance features they unlock.

Detailed desktop and tenant-portal screenshots make the rent-to-books workflow tangible and the small-landlord focus convincing.

Suggestion: Put landlord card and bank-transfer processing fees directly beside the 'Tenants pay $0' promise.

Exceptionally clear positioning and rich product screenshots show a complete, practical workflow for small landlords without charging tenants payment fees.

Suggestion: Publish the exact dollar amounts and unit limits for the Basic and Pro tiers directly on the homepage.

Detailed desktop and mobile screens plus a live demo make this broad landlord toolkit feel unusually tangible.

Suggestion: Put the free, Basic and Pro limits in one compact table before the long feature tour.

A focused small-landlord workflow combines rent, tenant portal, leases, inspections and finances, with detailed product screenshots and Stripe and Plaid named.

Suggestion: Show the full paid-plan price table beside the free-plan limits so landlords can see costs before importing tenants and leases.

Product screenshots, Stripe and Plaid badges, ESIGN certificates and a free three-property plan make this easy to trust quickly.

Suggestion: Add one landlord testimonial with a portfolio size to turn the feature list into social proof.

Polished landlord suite with fee-free tenants, a live demo and strong per-property screenshots.

Suggestion: Surface the paid-plan price on the homepage next to the free tier so cost is obvious early.

The strongest evidence here: real screenshots of rent, signatures, finances and maintenance, with Stripe, Plaid and ESIGN named openly.

Suggestion: State on the pricing page who absorbs the Stripe card fee on rent payments, the first question every landlord asks.

Exceptionally clear pitch with real product screenshots, a live demo, tenant-pay-no-fees pricing and named infra partners like Stripe and Plaid.

Suggestion: Publish the Basic and Pro price points on the homepage snippet since the pricing page text was not crawlable and renters compare on price.

Strong small-landlord focus, clear screenshots of both desktop and mobile, and the tenant-fee-free promise is a real differentiator against the listed alternatives.

Suggestion: Publish a short explainer of how the $0 tenant fee is sustained given Stripe processing costs, since skeptics will want that math.

Clear niche positioning with a deterministic rules engine and stated pricing from $7,000 a year.

Suggestion: Add a customer logo or named case study near the demo video to show production use.

Separating AI extraction from deterministic hazard classification makes the compliance workflow unusually clear and credible.

Suggestion: Publish an annotated sample SDS tracing one ingredient through extraction, classification rules, review flags and final approval.

Smartly separates AI extraction from deterministic GHS hazard classification, addressing the exact accuracy concerns of chemical compliance teams.

Suggestion: Show a high-resolution screenshot of the actual SDS review and authoring interface right below the hero diagram.

The deterministic classification engine, audit trail and free indexing offer make a complex compliance purchase feel concrete.

Suggestion: Publish the full licence tiers and implementation costs alongside the $7,000 starting price.

Deterministic classification, audit trails, 60,000 CAS records and regulatory monitoring address a costly compliance workflow with unusually specific product detail.

Suggestion: Add a named customer example showing one supplier SDS converted, review time saved and the resulting compliant output.

Deterministic GHS classification instead of a black-box model is a credible differentiator for compliance buyers, backed by free tools.

Suggestion: Publish the full pricing tiers on a dedicated pricing page; only the $7,000 starting figure appears today.

AI-native SDS authoring with a deterministic rules engine, demo video and free indexing hook.

Suggestion: Publish a pricing page with tiers instead of only stating a $7,000 starting figure in copy.

Sharp focus on SDS authoring for chemical manufacturers, with a deterministic rules engine, a free indexing trial and a named team behind it.

Suggestion: Publish the licence tiers on the site rather than only the $7,000 starting figure, so buyers can size a plan before the demo call.

A narrow, costly problem addressed with a transparent extract-classify-review process, deterministic rules engine, free tools and a named founder on video.

Suggestion: Put the $7,000 base license figure on the homepage itself rather than only on the platform subpage.

Strong niche focus with a clear rules-engine plus AI story, regional coverage, and a free indexing offer that lowers the barrier to trying it.

Suggestion: Show a real customer SDS before and after the platform, with a time saved number, since the value proposition is otherwise abstract at the price point.

Warm, trustworthy page with a named founder, EU storage and transparent per-scan pricing.

Suggestion: Trim the nine-item grid to the three strongest uses so the receipt-chat value lands faster.

Receipt-based price history and pantry screenshots give the household proposition substance, though the feature breadth risks overwhelming new users.

Suggestion: Add a worked monthly cost example showing scans, chat questions, credit purchases and what Plus includes.

Charming editorial design and a personal founder touch turn mundane receipt scanning into a clever household pantry and budgeting assistant.

Suggestion: Translate the German grocery items in the English homepage's hero phone mockup so English-speaking visitors immediately understand the pantry view.

Receipt scanning, pantry tracking and meal planning form a distinctive household loop, supported by a named founder and guest demo.

Suggestion: Simplify the opening around scanning one receipt and answering one spending question, moving secondary tools lower.

Clear household-memory positioning, real app screenshots, guest demo, EU storage and named founder make the receipt-to-pantry proposition easy to trust.

Suggestion: Show a short before-and-after receipt scan with recognition accuracy on the homepage so visitors can verify line-item quality before signing up.

A real app with phone screenshots, a named founder, EU storage and export-anytime privacy builds unusually strong trust.

Suggestion: Show the chat answer and week-plan screens in the homepage demo so visitors see the product beyond the pantry view.

Distinctive receipt-to-pantry app with a warm crafted design and a named founder who answers email.

Suggestion: Localize the hero beyond German retailer logos so non-German households see themselves in the product.

Honest solo-built receipt app with EU storage, a named founder and a clear pay-per-scan price, though the meal-plan extras dilute the promise.

Suggestion: Move the searchable receipt archive promise to the top of the homepage; the pantry and week-plan blocks currently bury it.

A charming, transparent solo-founder product with guest access, per-scan pricing, clear privacy stance and real screenshots of pantry and chat.

Suggestion: Make the price-per-scan economics and Plus tier limits more prominent up top, since subscription-optional pricing is easy to miss.

Founder is named, EU-hosted, transparent about pricing and privacy, and the page shows real screenshots across web, Android and iPhone.

Suggestion: Add one short testimonial from a household that actually stopped using a separate budgeting app, to back up the nine-things-replaced pitch.

Strong evidence with docs, changelog, roadmap and clear tiers, though a large blank gap follows the hero.

Suggestion: Remove the empty space under the hero so the 'Works with' row and features appear right after the download button.

Local MCP access, remote sessions and clear history limits create a specific offer beyond basic usage tracking.

Suggestion: Replace the large blank stretch below the hero with the agent dashboard and a short session-monitoring recording.

Combines Mac hardware monitoring with AI coding agent session tracking and an MCP server, backed by flexible one-time or subscription pricing.

Suggestion: Remove the large empty vertical whitespace gap between the hero screenshot and the supported agents logos.

The combination of agent costs, plan limits and Mac metrics is specific, but the faded hero buries the product.

Suggestion: Replace the washed-out hero with a sharp dashboard capture and remove the large empty gap below it.

Agent sessions, spend, plan limits, remote machines and on-device PII form a timely niche, although the MCP-led hero obscures that core value.

Suggestion: Rework the hero to show sessions, tokens, cost and plan-limit bars first, with MCP as a secondary feature below.

An active source repo, changelog and roadmap plus real app screenshots show a maintained product, not a landing page.

Suggestion: Add a short video of the plan-limit bar warning before a Claude Code session is cut off.

Clear menu-bar bundle for AI-agent sessions plus Mac metrics, with on-device PII and an honest free tier.

Suggestion: Show a real cost-over-time chart in the hero so the spend-tracking value lands before the fold.

Rare pairing of Mac system metrics with Claude Code and Codex session, token and plan-limit tracking, plus a full changelog and roadmap.

Suggestion: Add a short pricing summary near the top so the free tier's 72-hour session history limit is clear before the long scroll.

Clear tiering, docs, changelog, an active source repo and on-device PII handling make it credible, though the washed-out hero screenshot hides the app.

Suggestion: Replace the faded hero image with a crisp, full-contrast screenshot of the agent session and cost dashboard.

Real app screenshots, an active source repo, and a generous free tier make this feel like a working tool rather than a landing page.

Suggestion: Add a short case study or telemetry from real users showing how much the spend dashboard actually saved them, to validate the value beyond features.

Very clear offer with a fair free limit and named publisher, in a crowded scanner market.

Suggestion: Add a before-and-after image of a curved book page to prove the flattening claim.

On-device processing, actual app screenshots and explicit export limits make the privacy and pricing promises easy to understand.

Suggestion: Show a curved book-page photograph beside its exported PDF to demonstrate flattening and text preservation.

Strong privacy-first appeal with complete on-device processing, a generous 30-page daily free limit, and transparent subscription terms.

Suggestion: Add a side-by-side before-and-after photo showing how the app flattens a curved book page near the spine.

The on-device privacy promise, book flattening and unusually generous free export limit are explained with rare precision.

Suggestion: Add a side-by-side original and finished book scan near the top to prove the flattening quality immediately.

On-device OCR, book-page flattening and a generous 30-page daily free limit are clearly explained with clean screenshots and transparent pricing.

Suggestion: Add a downloadable sample PDF showing original photo, flattened scan and searchable text so visitors can inspect output quality before installing.

On-device scanning with no account, no cloud and no ads, plus a named company and 30 languages, is a strong privacy story.

Suggestion: Show the searchable-PDF result inside the phone screenshots so the OCR benefit is visible before download.

On-device scanning with book flattening and batch mode, clearly priced and free of accounts and ads.

Suggestion: Add a side-by-side before-and-after scan image near the top to prove the shadow and curve removal.

On-device scanning with book flattening and batch capture, backed by a clear 30-pages-a-day free tier and a named publisher.

Suggestion: Show one real before-and-after scan comparison at full size, since the current phone mockups are too small to prove output quality.

Beautifully clear page with real app screenshots, 30 localizations and a fair free limit, though it competes with Adobe Scan and Lens mostly on privacy.

Suggestion: Add a side-by-side scan quality comparison against Adobe Scan to make the on-device OCR advantage concrete.

Tight focus on on-device scanning, clear privacy claims, real screenshots, and a generous free tier make this a model focused-app landing page.

Suggestion: Add a short side-by-side comparison with Adobe Scan or Genius Scan on output quality to convert privacy-curious visitors who fear a trade-off.

Solid specifics and free viewers, though the visuals demo panel rendered empty in the snapshot.

Suggestion: Make the visuals demo panel render a static chart image before scripts load.

Unlimited free viewers and concrete modelling documentation make the team offer easy to evaluate.

Suggestion: Replace the empty-looking visuals panel with a fully rendered sample chart that remains visible before interaction.

Clean visual presentation and a compelling pricing model with unlimited free viewers make this a practical alternative to per-seat BI tools.

Suggestion: Show a screenshot of the visual data modeler linking tables together on the homepage to prove how relationships work.

Free unlimited viewers and forkable community dashboards distinguish an otherwise crowded dashboard builder.

Suggestion: Replace the faded hero montage with one crisp, interactive dashboard example that visitors can filter.

Specific visuals, formula counts, connector details, documentation links and free unlimited viewers make this credible despite intense competition from established BI tools.

Suggestion: Make the live demo explorable without signup and show one CSV-to-dashboard example with its data model and formulas visible.

Clean pricing with free unlimited viewers and a community gallery, but it competes head-on with Power BI and Tableau.

Suggestion: Lead with a side-by-side benchmark against Power BI on setup time and cost for a 10-person team.

Browser BI with a forkable community gallery and unlimited free viewers, backed by concrete specs and docs.

Suggestion: Put one live, interactive community dashboard embed on the homepage instead of static collage cards.

Clear freemium BI workspace with a community gallery and specific numbers like 22 visuals and 70 formulas, in a very crowded field.

Suggestion: Show one full worked example, from CSV upload to published shared dashboard, so the advantage over Power BI is visible rather than claimed.

Specific claims linked to documentation, a community gallery and free unlimited viewers give it substance against Power BI and Metabase, though hero screenshots are faint.

Suggestion: Sharpen the faded dashboard mockups in the hero so the actual chart quality is visible at first glance.

Clear positioning, polished visuals, and a working community gallery set it apart from generic BI pitches, though competition with Power BI and Metabase is fierce.

Suggestion: Add concrete customer logos or case studies showing how teams switched from the listed alternatives, since differentiation otherwise hinges on AI and community features.

Deep technical feature list, but no named company and no paid prices yet make commitment risky.

Suggestion: Name the company behind tsrelay and publish planned launch prices per viewer tier.

The single-binary architecture and detailed failover behavior address real operator needs, but performance claims lack visible measurements.

Suggestion: Publish a reproducible dropout-recovery demonstration with source interruptions, viewer playback and measured recovery times.

Deeply technical, authoritative copy speaks directly to streaming engineers, though the complete lack of company identity or UI visuals hurts trust.

Suggestion: Add a screenshot of the operator web panel or an example of the plain-text configuration file to show how it works.

The failure-splicing and failover details are impressively concrete, but this remains a beta with no launch licence prices.

Suggestion: Publish post-beta capacity prices and a dated launch plan beside the free beta offer.

One-binary deployment, raced multi-source failover and invisible reconnects are technically distinctive, but beta status and unnamed makers limit buyer confidence.

Suggestion: Add an operator-panel walkthrough with a two-source channel failing over, plus the zapping and recovery timings viewers actually experience.

Twenty-five concrete features and a clear software-only stance are promising, but it is a public beta with no contact address and no funding signal.

Suggestion: Publish a contact email and a launch price list so operators can commit beyond the free beta.

Deeply specified self-hosted restreamer with honest software-only licensing and a free public beta.

Suggestion: Add an operator-panel screenshot and a short zapping-latency benchmark to make the claims tangible.

Unusually precise engineering claims such as PCR rebuild, raced failover and byte-exact splices, but no screenshots of the panel and no named company.

Suggestion: Add two or three real screenshots of the operator panel and channel list above the fold to prove the software exists.

Deep, specific technical writing on failover, PCR rebuild and its own transport protocol, with an unusually clear software-only legal stance.

Suggestion: Name the team or company behind tsrelay and show one operator panel screenshot or short demo to prove the binary exists.

Impressive technical depth and a real niche, but the unknown maker, missing contact page, and unclear launch pricing make it hard to trust with infrastructure.

Suggestion: Publish a named team, a working demo or trial download, and concrete post-beta pricing so operators can plan a migration.

Broad feature list, but small usage counters like 18 brands monitored weaken credibility rather than build it.

Suggestion: Replace the usage counters with a real screenshot of an AI visibility report near the hero.

Named integrations and modest activity counts are useful, but the broad platform pitch lacks a visible end-to-end product example.

Suggestion: Replace the stock hero backdrop with a real brand-monitoring result linked to a content draft and publishing approval.

Attempts to unify AI visibility tracking with a freelance creator marketplace, but shows zero screenshots of the actual software interface.

Suggestion: Replace the generic cityscape hero background with an actual product screenshot showing an AI visibility scan report.

Specific integrations and usage rates help, but the sprawling scope and tiny activity counts weaken the growth promise.

Suggestion: Lead with one AI visibility workflow and show an actual report instead of the stock city hero.

The platform promises visibility, content, social, ads and creator services at once, while tiny usage counters make the breadth feel unproven.

Suggestion: Lead with one AI-visibility report for a real brand, including prompts, competitor scores and recommended actions, instead of listing every capability.

Clear freemium pricing with itemized credit rates and named integrations, but only two short testimonials back the claims.

Suggestion: Replace the two thin quotes with case studies showing measured AI-visibility gains from named customers.

Broad AI-visibility and content bundle, but thin proof: tiny counters, initial-only quotes and no dashboard shots.

Suggestion: Replace the stock globe hero with a real AI-visibility dashboard screenshot and named customer logos.

Promises SEO, AI visibility, ads, social and a creator marketplace at once, supported by unverifiable counters and one first-name testimonial.

Suggestion: Replace the scrolling stat counters and single-name quote with one named customer case study showing a measured AI visibility change.

Breadth across AI visibility, SEO, ads and a creator network is real, but usage counters in the tens and pricing details hidden inside the app undercut credibility.

Suggestion: Show one concrete example report with real brand data and publish full plan prices on the public pricing page.

Wide feature list and a clean page, but the credit pack pricing is confusing and the homepage contradicts the pricing page on cost.

Suggestion: Simplify to one or two concrete plans instead of credit packs, and reconcile the $5 vs $25/month discrepancy before prospects trust the numbers.

Long-running tool with marketplace reviews, but stock photos and a boat hero hide what the product looks like.

Suggestion: Replace the hero slider with a screenshot of decompiled output before and after obfuscation.

Framework compatibility and batch configuration are concrete, but 'impossible to decompile' overstates what obfuscation can promise.

Suggestion: Replace absolute protection claims with a before-and-after decompiler example and explicit limitations.

An established .NET protection utility with Visual Studio Marketplace reviews, undermined by generic stock photos and a pitch for its own replacement product.

Suggestion: Replace the stock photos of speedboats and alien eyes with screenshots of the Skater GUI and decompiler before-and-after code views.

Marketplace reviews and long .NET support help, but stock imagery and absolute protection claims make the page feel dated.

Suggestion: Replace the boat and stock photos with a real obfuscation walkthrough and soften impossible-to-decompile claims.

The feature set and 71 marketplace reviews suggest an established tool, but dated stock imagery and absent visible pricing weaken confidence.

Suggestion: Replace the generic boat hero with a before-and-after decompiled code example and put current licence prices directly beside it.

Twenty years in the market and 71 Visual Studio Marketplace reviews prove traction, but the site looks dated and lacks privacy and terms pages.

Suggestion: Redesign the homepage with current product screenshots and add privacy and terms pages to match the claims.

Established .NET obfuscator with real marketplace reviews, but the dated page now splits attention toward Opaquer.

Suggestion: Lead with a before-and-after decompiler screenshot and move the Opaquer announcement below the fold.

A long-established paid obfuscator with Visual Studio Marketplace reviews, presented on a dated page of stock photos and no privacy or terms pages.

Suggestion: Replace the boat and stock-photo hero with a screenshot of obfuscation settings and a link to the actual prices page.

Two decades of history and a 4.6 Marketplace rating are real assets, but the stock-photo boat hero and dated layout undercut the top-tier claim.

Suggestion: Replace the speedboat hero and stock photos with an actual before-and-after decompilation comparison showing the protection working.

Mature product with a real company behind it, but the dated site design and stock-photo-heavy layout undermine confidence in a security tool.

Suggestion: Refresh the homepage visuals with a modern product screenshot and feature comparison table to compete on the page with Dotfuscator and Eazfuscator.

Admirably honest about scoring limits, but no maker name, privacy page or sample report is shown.

Suggestion: Add a named maker, privacy policy link and a sample full report preview above the $39 button.

The score disclaimer and editable parsed text are useful, but the paid report's depth is not visible.

Suggestion: Show a complete sample paid report beside the purchase box, including specific rewrites and the scoring breakdown.

Refreshingly honest about not being a real employer ATS score, but $39 for a single job posting on a bare workers.dev subdomain is steep.

Suggestion: Display a complete sample output report on the page so buyers can see the exact fixes they get before paying $39.

The free in-browser scan is honest about its limits, but $39 for one posting is a difficult commitment without buyer safeguards.

Suggestion: Add a named owner, privacy policy and sample full report beside the Gumroad purchase button.

The tool is immediate and honestly says its score is not an employer ATS score, but no sample report substantiates the paid fix.

Suggestion: Show a complete anonymised sample report beside the free scan so the 39-dollar upgrade value is visible before payment.

Refreshingly honest that its score is not an ATS score, with the $39 price shown before any signup.

Suggestion: Add privacy and terms pages and name the maker, since resumes are sensitive and the site sits on a workers.dev subdomain.

Honest one-time-price resume matcher that runs free in the page, but bare and anonymously hosted.

Suggestion: Add privacy and terms pages and a custom domain so job seekers trust it with their resume.

Honest about what the score means and free of subscriptions, but resumes are uploaded to a page with no privacy policy, terms or named maker.

Suggestion: Publish a privacy policy, terms and a named contact on the same page before asking anyone to upload a resume.

The honest disclaimer and one-time $39 pricing are refreshing, but a workers.dev domain, no privacy page and no report example undermine confidence.

Suggestion: Host on a real domain and show a sample full report so buyers know what $39 buys before paying on Gumroad.

Honesty about not being an ATS score is refreshing, but a workers.dev URL with no company, contact page, privacy or terms makes handing over a resume hard.

Suggestion: Add a real company name, contact email, privacy policy, and terms so users know who they are trusting with their personal data.

The honest is/isn't lists are clear, but there is no screenshot, no entry button and no privacy page visible.

Suggestion: Add a visible start button and one screenshot of an NDA redline in the first screen, plus a privacy link in the footer.

The scope and browser-storage warnings are candid, but the page shows no actual negotiation workflow.

Suggestion: Add a visible sample NDA walkthrough showing a negotiation rule, generated redline and export step.

A fun retro pixel-art theme explains what the tool is and isn't, but the homepage shows no actual workspace or obvious entry button.

Suggestion: Add a clear call-to-action button on the homepage that opens the NDA negotiation tool or shows a screenshot of a redlined contract.

The graveyard theme is memorable, while the plain limits and browser-only storage warning are responsibly explicit.

Suggestion: Add a short NDA walkthrough showing rule setup, AI redlining and export before visitors enter the app.

The is and is-not explanation is refreshingly honest, but the spooky presentation shows no workflow, entry point or evidence of completed negotiations.

Suggestion: Add an anonymised end-to-end example showing an uploaded NDA, matched rules, drafted redlines and negotiation-time tracking.

Honest scope limits and the browser-storage warning are good, but the page shows no product screens, demo, or any trust pages.

Suggestion: Add screenshots or a video of an NDA negotiation in progress plus privacy and terms pages.

Charming free NDA negotiation aid with candid limits, but the homepage shows no working product.

Suggestion: Embed a live sample negotiation or screenshots of the redline view on the landing page.

Refreshingly candid about being a free in-browser NDA aid that stores nothing, but the page never shows the tool itself.

Suggestion: Add a screenshot or short walkthrough of setting negotiation rules and redlining an NDA, since none of the app is visible.

Honest scope-setting and a free model are welcome, but the site shows no screenshots, no privacy or terms pages, and warns data lives only in the browser.

Suggestion: Add two or three screenshots of the actual negotiation workflow so visitors can see what they get before committing time.

Charming theme and clear scope limits, but the homepage only shows a welcome screen, the app is not visible, and there is no funding or legal page anywhere.

Suggestion: Show one screen of the actual negotiation workflow above the fold so visitors can see what they get, and add a contact and privacy page.